On Constructing Semantic Decision Tables
نویسندگان
چکیده
Decision tables are a widely used knowledge management tool in the decision making process. Ambiguity and conceptual reasoning difficulties arise while designing large decision tables in a collaborative environment. We introduce the notion of Semantic Decision Table (SDT), which enhances a decision table with explicit decision semantics by annotating it properly with a domain ontology. In this paper, we focus on the SDT construction process. First, we map decision items to the ontology by building a rooted tree of decision binary facts and visualize it in a scalable manner. Formal ontological roles are used during this mapping process. Then, we commit the decision rules to the mapping results with a high level pseudo-natural language to ground their semantic. We illustrate with an SDT example from the domain of human resource management.
منابع مشابه
Use Semantic Decision Tables to Improve Meaning Evolution Support Systems
Meaning Evolution Support Systems have been recently introduced as a real-time, scalable, community-based cooperative systems to support the ontology evolution. In this paper, we intend to address the problems of accuracy and effectiveness by using Semantic Decision Tables. A Semantic Decision Table separates general decision rules from the processes, bootstraps policies and template dependenci...
متن کاملTowards constructing an Integrative, Multi-Level Model for Cognition: The Function of Semantic Networks
Integrated approaches try to connect different constructs in different theories and reinterpret them using a common conceptual framework. In this research, using the concept of processing levels, an integrated, three-level model of the cognitive systems has been proposed and evaluated. Processing levels are divided into three categories of Feature-Oriented, Semantic and Conceptual Level based o...
متن کاملTowards Group Decision Making via Semantic Decision Tables and Blackboards
Information infrastructures become increasingly decentralized. In these environments, coming up with coherent collective decision systems is difficult, especially in environments where central “authorities” are lacking. In this paper, we explore the idea of using artifacts called Blackboards for Decision Tables to support collaborative and incremental evolution of a network of Semantic Decision...
متن کاملUsing SOIQ(D) to Formalize Semantics within a Semantic Decision Table
As an extension to decision tables, Semantic Decision Tables (SDTs) are considered as a powerful tool of modeling processes in various domains. An important motivation of consuming SDTs is to easily validate a decision table during the Validation and Verification (V&V) processes. An SDT contains a set of formal agreements called commitments. They are grounded on a domain ontology and considered...
متن کاملArrow Decision Logic
In this paper, we propose arrow decision logic (ADL), which combines the main features of decision logic and arrow logic. Decision logic represents and reasons about knowledge extracted from decision tables based on rough set theory, while arrow logic is the basic modal logic of arrows. The semantic models of ADL are pairwise comparison tables, which are useful in rough set-based multicriteria ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007